|
Post by Admin on Aug 5, 2012 22:11:14 GMT -5
We have discussed the first referendum on this November's ballot. The first question would change Fishers from a town to a Hybrid City. There will be a second referendum question on the ballot and that is to change Fishers from a town to a Traditional City.
The referendum questions in order will be:
“Shall the Town of Fishers and Fall Creek Township reorganize as a single political subdivision?” YES or NO “Shall the Town of Fishers change into a city?” YES or NO
The two referendum are two separate and independent questions. Both take a yes or no answer at the voting booth and have four outcomes:
YES YES --- Changes from a town to a hybrid city YES NO --- Changes from a town to a hybrid city NO YES --- Changes to a traditional city NO NO --- The town stays a town
Note that if both referendum passes, then the town council claims that Fishers will become a Hybrid City, which trumps the Traditional City.
This is quite strange since the Traditional City also won too, so how did it just lose?
Those that just voted for a Traditional City and it wins but if the Hybrid City also wins, it would disenfranchise those that voted for a Traditional City since it would lose. Or would it?
Confused yet?
That's the problem with having both referendums on the ballot at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by faulty on Aug 26, 2012 20:12:05 GMT -5
This was done on purpose by the Town to confuse everyone. Typical of the way Fishers operates.
|
|